TWO BIG BALLS ON THE CHEST

www.wykop.pl

This is an image of SARENNA LEE

She is known for her good looks and oversized breasts.

 

This may seem like a funny blog as an aside to my other ones. There are however some serious issues to raise about how and why a modern female would wish to change her appearance to such a degree as to accept silicone implant technology in her chest.

 

I called the Blog 'TWO BIG BALLS ON THE CHEST' because

 

1. That's how it appears to me

2. It is 239 in Standard English or 86 in Pythagorean Gematria.

 

The number 239 can be a reference to the MOON (its alleged distance to be 239,000 miles from EARTH)

 

It can perhaps refer to the date of 23rd September in the Calendar as well as refer to PLUTONIUM-239, written Pu-239, a highly radioactive element

 

SILICONE is a derivative word of SILICON which is a Chemical Element with the Symbol of  -Si- and its number is 14 in the table of elements.

 

SILICON-SILICON is SiSi (or ISIS backwards).

 

There is a serious issue to raise about why a woman would be compelled to get BREAST IMPLANTS.

 

Over the years the female breasts have taken on a life all of their own, being adorned in Playboy or Penthouse magazines for years in the 21st century for example.

 

They have also been presented in a different way with the advent of new underclothing called BRAS or BRASSIERES, which were later modified to make a woman's breasts more appealing to a male onlooker with PUSH UP or SQUEEZE capabilities.

 

These changes brought on the effect of making a woman's chest, (their inherent purpose is to provide milk to the newborn and developing young child after birth) look more like a pair of BALLS placed close together upon the chest.

 

Why would underwear designers create an item of clothing that would create this effect?

 

I thought about how the Masonic order revered this person they called TUBAL CAIN, so I wondered if the aesthetic pleasing view of female breasts squeezed together was more symbology of TUBAL CAIN in Freemasonry.

 

In a way the modern BRASSIERE denegrates a female, turning her into a prostituted being who enjoys wearing such a device to glorify and arouse men who view her breasts. The breasts squeezed together also mirror that of a sexual position derogatively named as the DOGGY POSITION, a primal sexual position that even ancient CAVE MEN could do.

 

So the Breasts held together in a BRA synchronize with a rear view of a woman's BUTTOCKS, so that a MAN sees abundantly sized breasts squeezed together and thinks about the BUTTOCKS which makes him think about SEX or the invitation of SEX with the BREASTS exposed via modern female fashion design.

 

Another issue to raise is that BREAST IMPLANTS could lead to a desire for BODY MODIFICATION, i.e instead of having BREAST ENHANCEMENT through SILICONE IMPLANTS, why not consider genetic changes prior to the birth of a newborn baby so that a potential female child will grow up and develop the desired sized BREASTS that the mother did not inherit through her geneaology.

 

So there could be an issue of EUGENICS raised from the benign issue of BREAST ENHANCEMENT.

 

Either the baby is modified within the womb during pregnancy, or after pregnancy with the help of hormone therapy or genetic therapy so that the female child could achieve the desire outcome of large breasts.

 

It also raises the issue of BODY IMAGE for women. Why is a woman unhappy with the body that she has inherited?

 

One problem may be the issue of POROGRAPHY and the desire of some women with certain body types to happily display themselves naked for magazines and internet companies

There may be a WAR declared upon WOMEN to make them feel inadequate. So a FEMALE'S divine nature and how her true feminity can and should be expressed in the world is being undermined and FEMALES are being LOCKED IN or IMPRISONED into a PHYSICAL paradigm and so they are unable to express their whole Female side which is Spiritual, Motherly and Divine (Female aspect)